This receiving email address was subscribed to our email list at our website. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Listener Q + A
Listener Comment -
Which New Year?
Tsiyon Answer -
Which New Year Listener Comment -
Be fruitful and multiply?
Tsiyon Answer
- Be fruitful and multiply Weighed against these Scriptural factors, we have verses like these:
Matthew 19: 11+12, 1 Cor 7:28-35. Here both Messiah and Paul speak
of the advantages for the Kingdom of remaining single, for those who
are gifted with celibacy. Singleness is not presented as the proper
choice for everyone, but only for those with the gift. This gift is
exceptional and is not for most people. Of course, those who are
gifted for singleness do not have the concern regarding family and
children, so are free to devote their whole attention to Kingdom
interests, which is great for them. On the other hand, people like
me who are meant to be married to the woman of Yah's choice, are
empowered through that marriage and family to glorify God beyond
what they could do alone. A marriage and family that is centered on
Him is still the most powerful social unit possible on planet earth
and has the potential to glorify God like nothing else I know of.
Now, bringing this back to our subject, the Scriptures seem to offer
the choice of singleness or marriage. They don't seem to even
consider married believers actively interfering with conception. At
least, I am not aware of a single instance of this in Scripture,
other than the unfavorable case of Onan cited above (Gen 38:6-10).
The general tenor of Scripture seems to be that marriage includes
the possibility of children, which are given as YHWH pleases, when
He pleases, as a blessing to the family. If anyone sees a Scriptural
argument to the contrary about this I remain open to it. All I'm
saying is I haven't seen that in Scripture. | ||||||||||||||
Tsiyon Paradigm Shift #261~ Latest Book! ~
If you know someone who would like to receive this newsletter, please forward. | ||||||||||||||
It is also of interest that the historic position of virtually all
Christian churches, until the Lambeth conference of 1930, has been
that interference with conception is sinful (NPF or Natural Family
Planning is not included in "interference with conception" as used here
- see more info on NPF
here).
For example, John Calvin, an early Protestant leader, expressed this
view: "Deliberately to withdraw from coitus in order that semen may
fall on the ground is a doubly monstrous [thing]. For this is to
extinguish the hope of the race and to kill before he is born the
hoped-for offspring. This impiety is especially condemned, now by
the Spirit through Moses' youth, that Onan, as it where, by a
violent abortion, no less cruelly than filthily cast upon the ground
the offspring of his brother, torn from the maternal womb. Besides,
in this way he tried, as far as he was able, to wipe out part of the
human race. If any woman ejects a fetus from the womb with drugs, it
is reckoned a crime incapable of expiation and deservedly Onan
incurred upon himself the same kind of punishment, infecting the
earth by his semen, in order that Tamar might not conceive a future
human being as an inhabitant of the earth." (Calvin's Latin
Commentary on Genesis - 38:10) From Eliyahu It seems that dealing with the early chapters of Genesis is bringing up a number of controversial issues. Here at Tsiyon we strive to tell you the truth of Scripture, whether popular or not. This continues with our latest program on the Curse of Canaan. What does the Scripture actually say about this? The Scriptures on this are much clearer than all the opposing theories would leave one to believe. Verse by verse, and sometimes word by word, we untie this Gordian knot in this new message. Be blessed as you hear it. Blessings and Shalom, | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
©2011 Tsiyon A130-425, 5701 W Slaughter LN, Austin, TX, USA,
78749 You may leave feedback, prayer requests and donations online here. |