|
|||||
~ Pass this newsletter on to a friend! ~ |
Every Sabbath | ||||
![]() | |||||
![]() | |||||
Keep Tsiyon Road | |||||
Join us online tonight! |
See the premier | ||||
| |||||
| |||||
Also, you can choose a Tsiyon Partner level using a button in the footer of any page at the Tsiyon.Net site. **************************************** From Eliyahu
Consider this:
No matter who wrote it, it is a fact - history books often preserve an altered narrative of history preferred by those in power. The term "historical revisionism" has often been applied to this, but recently scholars are backing away from that term for false history. That's because "Historical revisionism" is also applied to cases of revising the false narrative of history back to a more accurate picture of history. Now, "historical negationism" is the preferred term for cases in which history has been rewritten to negate unwanted disclosure of the actual truth of history. Of course, individuals often rewrite their own history, to be seen in the best possible light. But, when whole civilizations practice historical negation, that can have lasting effects on all later generations. This practice of the elite altering the narrative of their history goes back through virtually all civilizations to very ancient times. The reason for this is simple; history has a lot to do with how any civilization sees itself, and it is therefore politically expedient to maintain a version of history that preserves the most flattering narrative of a people and their leaders. The Bible is a huge exception to this, since it includes the major sins and blunders of both the people and the elite leaders of the Biblical nation. A truthful record was deemed more important than a flattering story by the writers and keepers of the Scriptures. Outside of the Scriptures, all accounts of history should rightly be skeptically viewed.
Protestant Christians may take exception to this, saying their movement left the Roman Catholic Church, so can't be counted in with their history. While it is admirable that the reformers saw abuses of the Roman Church, and sought to reform the Church, the question must be asked: What were they reforming? They were reforming some version of the Roman Church i.e. the Christian Church. No attempt was made by the reformers to uncover the true early history of the Roman Church that they were "protesting." They were simply trying to continue what they saw as a better version of the institutionalized Church they were protesting against. All of the imperfections and abuses were laid at the feet of the Catholic Church of 325 AD forward. What about the period between the Apostles and the Roman Catholic Church of 325 AD? The reformers simply assumed a link between the Apostles and that Roman Church, through which they also saw themselves as connected with the 1st century believers. In other words, they stopped short of the full truth.
See the premier of this re-mastered video entitled: Paul Was Never Part of the Christian Church! This historical picture will answer many questions for you, will iron out inconsistencies you've often wondered about, and will bring new clarity and a deeper understanding of what being a disciple of Messiah really means. Join us for our live meeting to be aired tonight, at tsiyon.net, at 8 pm cst. Invite your friends to register free of charge and join us for this special meeting. Each of these "Restoring The Assembly" videos fit together to undo past mistakes, and to point the way back to a restoration of the authentic Assembly established by Messiah in the 1st Century. Blessings and good health to you! Eliyahu P.S. - Who was Paul, really? Knowing the truth about this can change your life. |
You can tune in to Tsiyon Road from around the world by using one of the
free apps on you mobile device from
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||||||
| |||||||
©2020 Tsiyon - Tsiyon A130-425, 5701 W Slaughter LN, Austin, TX, USA, 78749 You may leave feedback, prayer requests and comments here. Please donate online here. |